Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Convalescent plasma (CP) treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has shown significant therapeutic effect when administered early (eg, Argentinian trial showing reduced hospitalization) but has in general been ineffective (eg, REMAP-CAP trial without improvement during hospitalization). To investigate whether the differences in CP used could explain the different outcomes, we compared neutralizing antibodies, anti-spike IgG, and avidity of CP used in the REMAP-CAP and Argentinian trials and in convalescent vaccinees. We found no difference between the trial plasmas, emphasizing initial patient serostatus as treatment efficacy predictor. By contrast, vaccinee CP showed significantly higher titers and avidity, being preferable for future CP treatment. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02735707 and NCT04479163.

Original publication

DOI

10.1093/infdis/jiad070

Type

Journal article

Journal

J Infect Dis

Publication Date

11/08/2023

Volume

228

Pages

245 - 250

Keywords

COVID-19, IgG, SARS-CoV-2, avidity, convalescent plasma, neutralizing antibody, treatment, Humans, SARS-CoV-2, Antibodies, Neutralizing, COVID-19, Blood Donors, Antibodies, Viral, Immunization, Passive, COVID-19 Serotherapy