Skip to main content

Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The UK Infected Blood Inquiry report was published in May 2024 after 6 years of taking oral and written evidence from patients, clinicians, blood services, government officials and politicians about the transmission of infection by blood transfusion to thousands of patients in the 1970s through to the 1990s. The same problems with transfusion-transmitted infection occurred in many other countries in the same period but their reviews, inquiries and decisions about compensation occurred many years earlier than in the UK. The publication of the report has been welcomed but begs two important questions. Why was the inquiry so delayed in the UK? And why did it take so long to report? Further, the report itself deserves scrutiny. What were its findings and lessons learned? How will the findings be implemented and what are the implications, if any, for other countries?

Original publication

DOI

10.1182/blood.2024025976

Type

Journal

Blood

Publication Date

12/02/2025